didn't want to hijack Tenk's thread with this, but Miss Reil's post made me think, her RP she had linked to, personally if I had been there, only thing that would have bothered me is the 'sit and watch' part some people would be more likely to act. and generally fo me, RP should be interactive, and not just theatre.
but the mention of people 'upset at being tossed in an RP' s what made me sort of think, I seen on nings, blogs and all related to Babbage and other steamlands, where people say they were 'pulled into RP' just because someone rp'd nearby, or even complained because someone talked to them in character, typing some accent or another. personally, I'm all for RP being optional,
it cuts down on miles of rules and I don't get an admin suddenly there if i accedentally slip out an LOL or forget ((brackets)) and so on.
but in some cases, some people seem to take that to extremes as in 'noone RP's anywhere's in 50 meters of me, in my sight, or even talks to me in character'
I always took it to simply mean you don't have to participate if you don't want to, rather than 'you shouldn't even see it, hear it, or smell it."' just because someone's talking in character in a dance or social function, or just on the street, maybe doing a little bit of RP, and you happen to be in the same area, does not mean they're 'pulling you into RP' now if they come up to you and threaten to kill you, biting you, try interrogating you, go on about their quest for the holy hand grenade, or randomly walk into your house and start breaking pots and stealing bottles, then it's getting you involved. Roleplaying in sight of you is not pulling you in, talking in character is not necciserily pulling you in.
not justifying the 'hooker murders' as it's really unrelated,
just putting my two cents in, carry on
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This